Los Angeles vs Salt Lake City
Cost of living comparison for Los Angeles, California and Salt Lake City, Utah.
Los Angeles is approximately 18% more expensive than Salt Lake City. A single person needs about $4,135/mo in Los Angeles versus $3,494/mo in Salt Lake City.
Rent in Los Angeles vs Salt Lake City
HUD Fair Market Rents by bedroom count.
Income & earnings in Los Angeles vs Salt Lake City
Annual figures from Census ACS.
Home values in Los Angeles vs Salt Lake City
Average values and property tax.
Energy in Los Angeles vs Salt Lake City
Estimated monthly electricity and gas.
Healthcare in Los Angeles vs Salt Lake City
Marketplace premium estimates and coverage rate.
Taxes in Los Angeles vs Salt Lake City
State income and sales tax.
Transportation in Los Angeles vs Salt Lake City
Commute time and travel modes.
Monthly cost estimates in Los Angeles vs Salt Lake City
All categories combined.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions comparing Los Angeles and Salt Lake City.
Is Los Angeles or Salt Lake City more expensive?
Los Angeles is more expensive overall. A single person needs approximately $4,135/mo in Los Angeles, California and $3,494/mo in Salt Lake City, Utah, a difference of about 18%.
What is the rent difference between Los Angeles and Salt Lake City?
Average one-bedroom rent in Los Angeles, California is $2,081/mo versus $1,453/mo in Salt Lake City, Utah. Los Angeles is approximately $628 (43%) more expensive for a one-bedroom apartment.
Which has higher income, Los Angeles or Salt Lake City?
Salt Lake City has the higher average household income. Los Angeles households earn approximately $87,760 per year; Salt Lake City households earn approximately $94,658 per year.
More on Los Angeles and Salt Lake City
Read full profiles for either area, or pick a different pair to compare.
About this data
Figures come from official U.S. government sources including the Census Bureau (ACS), HUD Fair Market Rents, and the Energy Information Administration. See our methodology for details.